Subject: | Re: Hearing Topology (was 722 vs MixPre |
---|---|
From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
Date: | Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:07 am ((PDT)) |
At 9:39 AM +0000 3/20/09, Philip Tyler wrote: >...you are able to discern some topographical feature where the >recording was made! > >Phil > Thanks Phil. We can hear these spatial cues in the field quite easily if we set our minds to it. The ability to image primary reflective surfaces should come along with good localization performance of the stereo mic array. Its an accessible test one can apply to many recordings and others never know when I've listened to a file play 50 times before taking a guess. :-D Rob D. -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Nature Recordists] 722 vs MixPre, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: 722 vs MixPre, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Nature Recordists] 722 vs MixPre, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | 1. Re: field recorder list, obSession |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU