Re: LS-10 Update

Subject:	Re: LS-10 Update
From:	"Lou Judson" inaudio
Date:	Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:23 pm ((PST))

Definitely true!

There are examples such as the Alesis HD24 where the clock id
designed to work at 48k, and the 44.1 is off speed slightly. One
would assume it will be off by half as much at 88.2 but spot on at
Message: 96k. 
Subject: It's  question of division od the actual clock speed.

Just a quibble, thanks,

Lou
Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Feb 14, 2009, at 12:41 PM, oryoki2000 wrote:

> I also wrote, "Some people think this [recording at 88.2 kHz]
> helps preserve the sound of the original recording."  This part
> is true, some people do prefer 88.2, which is why Olympus added
> this sample rate to the capabilities of the LS-10.
>
> --oryoki

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LS-10 Update, Max Catterwell Re: LS-10 Update, oryoki2000 Re: LS-10 Update, Max Catterwell Re: LS-10 Update, Lou Judson Re: LS-10 Update, Steven Taylor Re: LS-10 Update, Lou Judson Re: LS-10 Update, Steven Taylor Re: LS-10 Update, oryoki2000 Re: LS-10 Update, Michael Oates Re: LS-10 Update, Lou Judson <= Re: LS-10 Update, Scott Fraser Re: LS-10 Update, Gianni Pavan Re: LS-10 Update, Gianni Pavan

Previous by Date:	Re: LS-10 operational question, Heather Perkins
Next by Date:	Re: Australian fires, Martyn Stewart
Previous by Thread:	Re: LS-10 Update, Michael Oates
Next by Thread:	Re: LS-10 Update, Scott Fraser
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU