naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LS-10 Update

Subject: Re: LS-10 Update
From: "Lou Judson" inaudio
Date: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:09 am ((PST))
Uh, Oriyoki, I have read (don't know for a fact) amongst digital
system designers that "throwing away every other sample" is a myth,
and that complex math must be performed for every SRC conversion -
logic might imply you just drop every other sample, but I think the
real digital world does not work that way. I am vague about the
details, but I recall people whom I respect saying it just isn't
simpler, only different math. Do you know factually? Would it be
worth me quoting sources? Is this too far off topic? "Some people
think..." applies to many areas beyond our personal expertises!
(Especially mine.)

Lou
Lou Judson =95 Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689


On Feb 14, 2009, at 10:54 AM, oryoki2000 wrote:

> Most audio files are distributed on CD or DVD in a 44.1 kHz, 16 bit
> WAV format.   Making the original recording with 88.2 kHz means the
> reduction to 44.1 is simpler (just throw out every other sample) than,
> say, the conversion from 96 kHz to 44.1 kHz.  Some people think this
> helps preserve the sound of the original recording.










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU