Subject: | 1. Re: Mono v. Stereo |
---|---|
From: | "John Hartog" hartogj |
Date: | Fri Jan 2, 2009 9:41 am ((PST)) |
> Hello John, > > Thanks for your kind words. > > I believe that we should leave it to the researchers themselves > whether they should use stereo or not. They probably do not need our > instructions. > > Regards, > Raimund Hi Raimond, I'm sure some find this discussion to be a monotonous rehashing of an already thoroughly discussed topic, but I think it is good to stir things up now and then and see where things settle: new ideas ideas can still rise to the surface. I personally enjoy it all, even at the risk of exposing to the world how little I actually know. I especially enjoy other's first-hand accounts of their nature recording projects and methods. Thanks, John Hartog |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: another site for nature ring tones, Dan Dugan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 2. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Walter Knapp |
Previous by Thread: | 1. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | 1. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Raimund Specht |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU