Subject: | 5. Re: Mono v. Stereo |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Thu Jan 1, 2009 10:54 am ((PST)) |
Lou Judson wrote: > I disagree on the mid mic; I find Cardioid is best, and identical > mics in coincident position essential for accurate imaging. But that > is a matter of taste I suppose. Okay, that might be true. Actually, I still have no much personal experience on this particular stereo setup. > There are stereo MS shotgun mics as well, no kluging needed. Just the > purchase price! Yes, I noticed that such a model is available from Sennheiser: http://tinyurl.com/9kxfjh Unfortunately, its L/R polar patterns above 2 kHz (these frequencies are important for bird song) are obviously less than optimal. This problem is also mentioned in the manual text. Regards, Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 4. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Kim Cascone |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 6. Re: Mono v. Stereo, John Hartog |
Previous by Thread: | 5. Re: Mono v. Stereo, John Hartog |
Next by Thread: | 5. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Michael Oates |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU