naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

5. Re: Mono v. Stereo

Subject: 5. Re: Mono v. Stereo
From: "John Hartog" hartogj
Date: Wed Dec 31, 2008 9:28 pm ((PST))
Raimund Specht wrote:

> However, other common stereo techniques such as XY, AB, ORTF or any of
> the head-based or baffled set-ups can introduce unwanted artifacts.
> Among the potential problems are comb filter effects or simply the
> fact that none of the two microphones are pointing exactly at the
> sound source. Due to physical limitations, there is no microphone that
> exhibits a perfect omnidirectional pick-up pattern for all signal
> frequencies. At least at frequencies above 10 kHz, the frequency
> response is no longer flat for off-axis sounds, which means that high
> frequency components will NOT be recorded properly.


If this is a concern, as long as one of the mics in any of those
stereo configurations is on-axis to the subject, that channel could be
used for mono applications if needed - and the other channel for
spacial support. In which case the problems as you describe would not
be an issue. 


John Hartog






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU