Subject: | 2. Re: Mono v. Stereo |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Thu Jan 1, 2009 10:20 am ((PST)) |
Walter Knapp wrote: > Maybe you should go back and look at the polar patterns of shotgun mics. > They are picking up 60 degrees or more in their central pattern. So, > tight selectivity in them is more myth than reality. The directionality also depends on the frequency. Higher frequencies will be attenuated more effectively from off-axis directions. Even if their pick-up pattern is not extremely narrow (compared to a parabola for instance), they provide an significant advantage over the omnidirectional or cardioid models used in stereo setups. Or what else would be the reason why shotgun microphones are being manufactured? Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 1. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Walter Knapp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 3. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Lou Judson |
Previous by Thread: | 2. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Walter Knapp |
Next by Thread: | 2. Re: Mono v. Stereo, Walter Knapp |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU