naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mono v. Stereo

Subject: Re: Mono v. Stereo
From: "John Tudor" jtudor2005
Date: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:38 am ((PST))
Another thing worth considering (in my humble experience) is that with
mono recording, you may get a nice clean recording of a bird
vocalising for example. But with stereo, you may gain considerable
insight from other sounds not heard in mono. Was the bird just talking
to itself for instance, or was it actually responding to another bird
or threat off centre that has not been picked up in mono.

One thing I've often wondered about is how much useful information has
been missed over the ages by not having a complete picture of that
moment in time that is captured by a recording or photo. What's just
out of frame? What's just out of earshot?

Just an rambling thought

Regards
John




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU