Subject: | Re: Mono v. Stereo |
---|---|
From: | "John Tudor" jtudor2005 |
Date: | Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:38 am ((PST)) |
Another thing worth considering (in my humble experience) is that with mono recording, you may get a nice clean recording of a bird vocalising for example. But with stereo, you may gain considerable insight from other sounds not heard in mono. Was the bird just talking to itself for instance, or was it actually responding to another bird or threat off centre that has not been picked up in mono. One thing I've often wondered about is how much useful information has been missed over the ages by not having a complete picture of that moment in time that is captured by a recording or photo. What's just out of frame? What's just out of earshot? Just an rambling thought Regards John |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Mono v. Stereo, Raimund Specht |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 1. Re: AT3032, Curt Olson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Mono v. Stereo, Raimund Specht |
Next by Thread: | 1. Re: Curt Olson's new CD, Curt Olson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU