5. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?

naturerecordists

5. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?

Subject:	5. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?
From:	"Phil Tyler" macmang4125
Date:	Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:33 am ((PST))

As the actual unit fits into the CF card slot of a PDA I think that
makes the recorder quite samll.

Phil

--- In  Lou Judson <> wrote:
>
> Then it isn't very small any more, is it? Can you suggest a whole
> system that still qualifies as "smallest?"
>
> Just curious.
>
> <L>
> On Nov 12, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Phil Tyler wrote:
>
> It requires a PDA and a preamp.
>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
5. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, Phil Tyler <=

Previous by Date:	4. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, Lou Judson
Next by Date:	6. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, oryoki2000
Previous by Thread:	4. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, Lou Judson
Next by Thread:	6. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, oryoki2000
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU