| Subject: | 4. Re: smallest 192K recorder ? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
| Date: | Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:01 am ((PST)) |
Then it isn't very small any more, is it? Can you suggest a whole system that still qualifies as "smallest?" Just curious. <L> On Nov 12, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Phil Tyler wrote: It requires a PDA and a preamp. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 3. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, Phil Tyler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 5. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, Phil Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | 3. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, Phil Tyler |
| Next by Thread: | 5. Re: smallest 192K recorder ?, Phil Tyler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU