| Subject: | Re: 1 bit recording |
|---|---|
| From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
| Date: | Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:52 am ((PDT)) |
Hello Mike, Yes, the term 'noise floor spectrum' would be appropriate for your measurements. The 'frequency response' is defined as follows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_response Regards, Raimund --- In "picnet2" <> wrote: > > Hello Raimund, > Ive updated the entry, thank you for pointing this out - I tend to use > "response" without indicating what it is related to. Perhaps stating spectra, or noise floor response would be more appropriate? > > BR, > Mike > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 1 bit recording, picnet2 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 1 bit recording, Gianni Pavan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 1 bit recording, picnet2 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1 bit recording, Gianni Pavan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU