Thanks, Volker. We'll give that a shot although I haven't had an
issue with the phantom center bulge so far. When actually tested the
MKH30/40 system, it worked pretty smoothly across the left, center,
right space. We'll check again and test next week in the field.
Bernie
On Oct 10, 2008, at 5:04 AM, Volker Widmann wrote:
> Hi Bernie!
>
> I recently switched over from a MKH80/40 MS-pair to MKH80/20. (MKH80
> used as as figure of 8 equivalent to an MKH30)
> I did this because I found out that the stereo image with the MKH20 is
> more coherent, very much similar to the image of a Neumann KU100, but
> without the "hole in the middle".
> I always had the feeling that with the MKH40 there is a bulge in the
> image in front. My friend Walter Tilgner who uses a KU100 has the same
> impression. We did several side by side tests.
> But maybe ours is a different approach. We are intersted in seamless
> natural soundscapes. Other might want an emphasis on the mid channel.
>
> Cheers
>
> Volker
>
> Bernie Krause schrieb:
> >
> > Anyone compared the stereo, spatial depth imaging between an MS rig
> > using MKH30/40 and MKH30/20? Curious about the spatial impressions
> > rather than hard science.
> >
> > Bernie Krause
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony
|