Nothing needs be done, Robin. We're not speaking about evil, here.
Only a wee bit of hubris. And not truly important stuff. I think
enough has been said on this issue. Let's move on. And, yes, John and
I were partners back in the mid-60s. Good to hear from you.
Bernie
On Sep 12, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Robin Aurelius wrote:
> Dear Bernie: Just his poetic license exuberance. But he needs to be
> taken to task for it. What can we purists do to him?
> Remember me from Town School for Boys.science teacher and..when you
> were the partner of John Klempner?
> Robin Aurelius
>
> --- On Fri, 9/12/08, Bernie Krause <> wrote:
>
> From: Bernie Krause <>
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] The Real Hempton
> To:
> Date: Friday, September 12, 2008, 12:07 PM
>
> That's exactly the kind of Hempton bull-shit I was speaking of
> yesterday (trying to be kind).
>
> 40 years ago this year, when I first began recording in the field, I
> was also working primarily as a professional musician and was doing
> an album for Warner Brothers with my late music partner, Paul Beaver
> (we introduced the synthesizer to pop music and film, BTW). Titled
> "In A Wild Sanctuary" - the first album on ecology and the very first
> to use natural sounds as a component of orchestration, it was my
> first attempt to capture sounds in what I then naively considered
> "the wild." The equipment was primitive. Our expertise outdoors was
> next to nil. When I tried to capture the sound of a nearby stream,
> having brought the recording back to the studio for editing, it
> sounded terrible. Contributing to many films (139 features total over
> the years including "Rosemary's Baby," "Apocalypse Now," "Shipping
> News," "Castaway," etc., etc.,) I was more than a little familiar
> with Foley techniques (i. e. creating sound-alike efx out of wholly
> different sources). Mid-winter during our 1968 production, I was left
> with no alternative other than to capture the running water sound
> from whatever source I could. Turned out to be a toilet in my San
> Francisco house. And so I did. "Guilty, yer honor." When I first met
> Hempton, a charming fellow, by the way, I shared with him this little
> story in confidence as a singular example of what kinds of extremes
> we had to go to in the early years. Somehow or other, Hempton, in his
> uninformed arrogance and desperation, has offered this extraordinary
> crime as evidence that my work, in particular, and compared with his
> "purist" contentions, has been loaded with studio production
> techniques that obviate the purist mantle with which he has anointed
> himself and traded upon for years. This is really annoying, folks.
> It's also misleading and very stupid. I can assure you that nothing
> anyone does is "pure." You choose a mic system that you like the
> sound and space of (a form of edit [decision one]). You choose the
> time and place to record (another edit). You choose which direction
> your mics will face (yet another edit). Then, if you're creating
> media formats out of your field recordings, you're editing, again, as
> to which parts of which clips you'll finally use. This is not to
> castigate Hempton's work or result. Some of it is magical. It's the
> attitude that sucks and he's got to find another way to set himself
> apart other than dinging others for their good effort. It does not
> serve him or his work well.
>
> Bernie Krause
>
> On Sep 12, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Kim Cascone wrote:
>
> > http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=3D9AFG9B8gDrk
> >
> > I'm watching the short trailer from the documentary about Gordon
> > Hempton aka Soundtracker Juan Carlos posted to the naturerecordists
> > list
> > and towards the end of the clip Mr. Hempton says something
> > interesting:
> >
> > '...there were some major nature sound series that were selling
> > mountain streams that were in fact recordings out of a toilet,
> > that were selling mountain air, mountain breeze that were recordings
> > made from elevator shafts...'
> >
> > I'm interested in hearing people's reactions to this
> > statement... thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
>
> Wild Sanctuary
> POB 536
> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> 707-996-6677
> http://www.wildsanc tuary.com
> .com
> Google Earth zooms: http://earth. wildsanctuary. com
> SKYPE: biophony
>
>
>
>
>
Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com
Google Earth zooms: http://earth.wildsanctuary.com
SKYPE: biophony
|