Subject: | 1. M-S vs Barrier Stereo Arrays (was Decca Tree? |
---|---|
From: | "Kim Cascone" anechoicmedia |
Date: | Tue Sep 2, 2008 12:39 pm ((PDT)) |
> There are different mics used in each array and there are some > annoying changes in background sounds that I'd like to avoid in > future comparisons, but this attempt suggests to me that the > differences and tade-offs are probably going to be pretty dramatic > and complex in diffuse field contexts. Note that all three rigs were > running at once so the impulses are identical. > Rob none of them have a smooth transition across the middle/center at least while playing it back via: Powerbook G4->Firebox->AKG 240K headphones they all exhibit a fuzzy or blurred center space as the sound moves from left to right the one that comes closest to a smooth transition is the M-S, oddly enough but I'd also like to hear a spaced A-B with and without a middle omni as a comparison KIM |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Cristian the lion, artsonics |
---|---|
Next by Date: | dealing with moisture in humid environments, Kim Cascone |
Previous by Thread: | 1. M-S vs Barrier Stereo Arrays (was Decca Tree?, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | 1. Re: Decca Tree?, Scott Fraser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU