OLYMPUS LS-10: WL183s vs BUILTIN

naturerecordists

OLYMPUS LS-10: WL183s vs BUILTIN

Subject:	OLYMPUS LS-10: WL183s vs BUILTIN
From:	"Vicki Powys" vpowys
Date:	Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:36 pm ((PDT))

On a calm day, using the Olympus LS-10 with recording level on 5, I  
recorded some ambience with small birds, comparing head-mounted Shure  
WL-183 mics with the built-in mics.  The WL-183s were MUCH quieter,  
although they did not boost the volume of the calls.  The best result  
was with the WL-183s and low cut ON.  (The WL-183s were powered using  
the LS-10s plug-in-power, turned on in the menu.)

For anyone interested I will upload a file with a medley of 3 clips,  
to the group web page:

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
OLYMPUS LS-10: WL183s vs BUILTIN, Vicki Powys <= Re: OLYMPUS LS-10: WL183s vs BUILTIN, Rob Danielson Re: OLYMPUS LS-10: WL183s vs BUILTIN, Vicki Powys

Previous by Date:	Re: Olympus LS-10 reviews, Paul Jacobson
Next by Date:	quietest, WL-183s, low cut on, vol. 5, Unknown
Previous by Thread:	Re: Olympus LS-10 reviews, oryoki2000
Next by Thread:	Re: OLYMPUS LS-10: WL183s vs BUILTIN, Rob Danielson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU