Subject: | Re: Olympus LS-10 clock accuracy (was Olympus LS-10 and ext mic |
---|---|
From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_audio |
Date: | Tue Jun 3, 2008 6:15 pm ((PDT)) |
At 7:20 PM -0400 6/3/08, Marc Myers wrote: >One of the folks on a video forum to which I subscribe had an >interesting take on this device. Many wedding photographers use a >small recorder and a mini lavaliere to capture the wedding vows. >Video is shot from a distance and the sound is synced later. In an >hour ceremony it's typical for the two devices to loose sync over >time and audio might be a second ahead or behind at the end. The >Olympus was seconds off in an hour. Really horrible performance for >its internal clock. Whoa! The Sony and Sharp Hi/MD's I use drift 4 frames max in 74 minutes. Could the LS-10 really be 100 times less accurate? It seems accurate timing could be important,.. but maybe not as there are no moving parts. Ironic. Rob D. -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Olympus LS-10 and ext mic, Marc Myers |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Olympus LS-10 clock accuracy (was Olympus LS-10 and ext mic, Gene Dorcas |
Previous by Thread: | Olympus LS-10 and ext mic, Debbi B |
Next by Thread: | Re: Olympus LS-10 clock accuracy (was Olympus LS-10 and ext mic, Gene Dorcas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU