| Subject: | 5. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report |
|---|---|
| From: | "" supernielsen |
| Date: | Fri May 23, 2008 9:08 am ((PDT)) |
Ray, I would say without having recorded anything, the LS10 is such a super= ior machine, in build quality, in menu layout, in responsiveness to use, in= metering, that it would still be my choice. I have the H2 because I like that it can record quad, but the LS10 will be the one I carr= y around more than not as a pocket recorder. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 4. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, tim@wildecho.com |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 6. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, John Lundsten |
| Previous by Thread: | 4. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, tim@wildecho.com |
| Next by Thread: | 6. Re: Olympus LS-10 Prel. Report, John Lundsten |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU