naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: Olympus LS-10

Subject: 3. Re: Olympus LS-10
From: "Phil Tyler" macmang4125
Date: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:50 am ((PDT))
Excellent info Raimund!

Is there any merit in giving results for the line input? The reason I ask is 
that there seem to 
be a number of people using separate mic pre-amps and the info might be useful?

Phil

--- In  "Raimund Specht" <> 
wrote:
>
> Hi Gianni,
> 
> I just measured the noise floors of the Olympus LS-10, the Marantz
> PMD620 and the TASCAM DR-1. The results can be found on my updated
> recorder test page:
> 
> http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
> 
> I will also measure the new MicroTrack II when I get the one I ordered
> back in February.
> 
> Regards,
> Raimund 
> 
> Gianni Pavan wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >     some time ago there were messages about the LS-10. but no definitive 
> > words about its suitability for nature recording. Any new finding ?
> > Now there are so many recorders... many debates are related with 
> > "usability", but at the very end my judgement is mostly abut quality 
> > and in particular quietness.
> > The two quietest machines appear to be the SD recorders and the
> Fostex FR-LE2.
> > Any new entry close to them ?
> > What about the new MAUDIO MicroTrack ?
> > Gianni
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 3. Re: Olympus LS-10, Phil Tyler <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU