It's probably ok for its purpose, but I would like to know how to do
what you're talking about.
I haven't used the parametric equalizer (if that's what you're referring
to) before, and I don't have an understanding of what it does--if it's
easy enough to give me some instruction, I'd appreciate it.
Rob Danielson wrote:
>
> Aesthetically, (if this is an issue at all) the EQ'd file sound to me
> like the frogs are muted by a landform or distance-- almost like you
> recorded them from your car or over a hill ;-). Maybe try letting
> some more of the treble above 3K Hz and more of bottom end survive?
> If you didn't take this approach already, I'd start with deep/narrow
> parametric notches at the heart of the "tinny" tree frog' calls. The
> Red Legged calls should have frequency enough separation to survive.
> The "space" will probably seem to shrink as you keep "hitting" the
> tree frogs @~2K (it may take many narrow parametric bands) but I
> suspect much less so if you leave some "sparkle" at the high and some
> distance "bass" cues at the bottom.
>
> I usually "bump-up" to 24bits before starting to process a field
> recording this intensively. Rob D.
>
>
--
/Debbi Brusco/
|