naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rode NT2000's (was Seeking advice for a beginner

Subject: Re: Rode NT2000's (was Seeking advice for a beginner
From: "Michael Oates" msohooates
Date: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:40 am ((PST))
Rob,

Thank you for your detailed reply, I will certainly not rule out using the =
NT2000 outside
in the future, although their large size and weight are not ideal for takin=
g out on a
walk, they really need to be used where they don't need to be carried far, =
or as you seem
to use them on a permanent site. I do have two of them.

Regards,

Mike

>At 8:50 AM +0000 2/23/08, Michael Oates wrote:
>>Rob,
>>
>>That's great to hear that these mics do not seem to suffer, I have a
>>couple of NT2000's
>>and I would never have thought of using them outside for wildlife
>>recording. I am curious,
>>do you record with those shopping bags over the windshields, if so,
>>how is the sound
>>affected.
>
>Hi Michael--  You should definitely take your NT2000's out. Here's a
>picture of the rig I'm using now:
>http://ad2004.hku.nl/naturesound/RobD/NT2000-Head-Spaced-Baffled-Rig-Danie=
lson.jpg
>This rig seems to take advantage of the NT2000's unique omni polar
>pattern quite well.  I interpret their low-midrange response
>(125-700Hz) as "very even" and capable of producing less of that
>"roar" impression from the background "air" or "presennce."
>Excellent transient response.  I believe Walt is also experimenting
>with rigs for these mics. We haven't heard about Bruce Wilson's
>practices in a while.
>
>The .5 mil bags are just my quick way of shielding the mics from
>side-ways driving rain. I monitor the mics much of the time and I
>have let the recorder roll with the plastic bag on. The rhythm and
>spatiality of tiny ice pellets on the bag was fun to listen to. The
>bag attenuates the high-end noticeably and, of course, makes obvious
>noises with the slightest breeze.
>
>I've used umbrellas for rain but they can easily collapse or blow
>away in a gust. With these Rode's, I can get away using a 24" X 24"
>plywood roof that is 18" above the rig. The platform does obstruct
>part of the sky and it reflects a tiny amount of ground-level sound
>from a narrow ring around the rig, but seems to provide 90% of the
>rain/snow/ice shielding required. When there's rain and breeze up to
>12-15 mph, or when the temp is below freezing and the wind is strong,
>I just let the mics sit in the open with just their faux fur covers.
>The snow and rain that does get in hasn't been enough to saturate the
>capsules and harm the mics, so far.
>
>I'm preparing a diffuse field, low ambient noise background
>localization test between an MS rig comprised of a mkh40/80 pair, a
>90 degree wedge with a pair of AT-3202's and an head-spaced Parallel
>Boundary Rig with NT2000's which might be able to portray some of the
>sound performance qualities of these rigs and mics. Rob D.
>
>
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>>If so, I cover the
>>>windscreens with with a .5 mil plastic shopping bag and twist tie and
>>>leave them out. The NT2000's are the least affected by wind of _any_
>>>mic I've ever used. Rob D.
>>
>>





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU