Subject: | 11. Re: Recording Software Question |
---|---|
From: | "Lou Judson" inaudio |
Date: | Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:31 pm ((PST)) |
I think this is a productive discussion, as long as we stay nice! see below: On Jan 10, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Aaron Ximm wrote: I think a lot of the reason each of us likes particular tools is that what we learned and internalized N years ago seems transparent and intuitive. TOO TRUE! That said, I do think ProTools is very cramped and underserved by a very old interface (among other things) that as I hear it from Digi people on the inside simply cannot evolve in core areas because the user base is SO particular about it continuing to work just as it always has. ... and the large user base that I know is always suggesting and requesting features and updates... only to find each new version gives something small useful, and lots that was not needed. To me it shows how outof touch Digi is with their users - unless there are a lot more vocal users than I know about! Alright, I'll shut up! I promise! Yer fine by me. <L> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 10. Re: Recording Software Question, Steven Taylor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 12. Re: Recording Software Question, Scott Fraser |
Previous by Thread: | 10. Re: Recording Software Question, Steven Taylor |
Next by Thread: | 11. Re: Recording Software Question, Danny Meltzer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU