naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

8. Re: Recording Software Question

Subject: 8. Re: Recording Software Question
From: "Aaron Ximm" aaron_gmail
Date: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:50 pm ((PST))
On Jan 10, 2008 12:44 PM, Steven Taylor <> wrote:

> Features shmeatures!
>
> "It's the interface, stupid!" :)
>
> I agree we shouldn't devolve into this debate here...

<bias>

...but, uh, have you actually used an ahem objectively superior
*contemporary* interface, like, for example, Sequoia!?

What I like about my favorite tools is the combination of deep toolset and
(IMO) unparalleled interface.

</bias>

I think a lot of the reason each of us likes particular tools is that what
we learned and internalized N years ago seems transparent and intuitive.

That said, I do think ProTools is very cramped and underserved by a very old
interface (among other things) that as I hear it from Digi people on the
inside simply cannot evolve in core areas because the user base is SO
particular about it continuing to work just as it always has.

Alright, I'll shut up! I promise!

 aaron



-- 
 
 quietamerican.org
 oneminutevacation.org

 83% happy
  9% disgusted
  6% fearful
  2% angry







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU