| Subject: | Re: MP3 vs CD |
|---|---|
| From: | "Hugh Livingston" oaklandonian |
| Date: | Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:11 pm ((PST)) |
It seems that this conclusively resolves the 16- v. 24-bit debate. >My only point to the previous email (about the cat) was that the CAT >thought there were real birds in the speakers... -- Hugh Livingston El Mirador 491 Crescent Ave #304 Oakland Calif 94610 (510) 205-HUGH www.livingstonsound.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: MP3 vs CD, Lou Judson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MP3 vs CD, Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MP3 vs CD, Lou Judson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MP3 vs CD, Rob Danielson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU