| Subject: | Re: Sanken COS 11 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Rob Danielson" danielson_rob |
| Date: | Wed Dec 12, 2007 8:24 am ((PST)) |
At 4:48 PM +0000 12/11/07, pueo9 wrote: >Has anyone used this mic or tested the self noise? I would be using >the phantom power only version as it seem to have about 5db more >gain. thanks ,chris > H Chris-- Likely some of the film/video folk on the rec.arts.movies list have used this mic. It seems like the COS 11 is aimed for close-up vocal lapel recording. If this is not your application, and considering its 28dB(A) self-noise rating, the EMKS-23 or WL-183's might be better suited for nature recording applications. The WL183's output is considerably higher and the fairly small profile EMKS-23 is much quieter. But, then, not knowing more about your application, there are suitable applications for every mic. Rob D. -- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Return after evaluation, Rob Danielson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Sanken COS 11, pueo9 |
| Previous by Thread: | Sanken COS 11, pueo9 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Sanken COS 11, pueo9 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU