At 4:48 PM +0000 12/10/07, jmcharcot wrote:
>Thanks for this review..
>
>Regarding the preamps, did you or someone else proceed to some other
>tests, do you think they are better than the ones of a HiMD like the RH1 or
>the RH10? I'd consider using it with an AT-822..
>
>Kind regards,
>
>JM.
Hi JM--
In terms of noise performance, the AT-822's "self-noise" [~24dB(A)]
is likely to be appreciably louder and "mask" much or all of the mic
preamps' noise associated with all of these recorders unless the
PMD620 is much noisier than its predecessors (unlikely). The same
would probably be true for many, older MD recorders. Based on some
tests with Hi-MD mic pres, one could begin to hear some preamp noise
performance differences when the mics' self noise is lowered into the
realm of 12dB(A). Rob D.
--
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|