I'll let you know I used the Powerex's in my FR2 and after several [9]
months they didn't hold a charge particularly well. I did end up
having difficulty getting enough power to get through a day.
I'd get some lithiums if you can, they really have quite a bit of juice.
Depends on how long you'll be out of course.
Danny
--- In "Jaap de Jong"
<> wrote:
>
> Dear Pratap Singh,
>
> You might check this site:
>
http://www.rechargeable-battery-review.com/rbr-editors-choice/2006-editors-=
choice/2006-top-10-aa-nimh-batteries-by-capacity.html
>
> I myself have the Powerex cells -and not that I am affiliated, nor
> want to be a salesman- these cells perform excellent! They outperform
> alkaline cells easily and hold their charge quit well. (82 % of their
> actual 2700 mAh capacity after 1 month, so that is about 2100 mAh!
> However, when you want your cells to be fully (100%) charged for 2
> months you might consider lithium cells, yes they are sold in AA's as
> well. I remember them to have a capacity of around 3000 mAh. Check the
> brand Energizer:
>
> http://www.energizer.com/products/lithium/default.aspx
>
> Good luck and, don't mind me asking, but what are you going to record
> and where? I would love to hear after you have don your fieldwork!
>
> Regards from the Netherlands,
>
> Jaap de Jong
>
>
> --- In Pratap Singh <pratap_wii@>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear Naturerecordists,
> >
> > I need advice on AA rechargeable batteries which can retain
> substantial charge for long duration (2 months or so) after charging.
> I need these batteries for Marantz PMD-671 recorder use in the field
> situations where charging facilities do not exist. I will be thankful
> for any suggestions.
> >
> >
> > Pratap Singh
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get the new Windows Live Messenger!
> > http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
> >
>
|