Subject: | Re: Measuring noise levels |
---|---|
From: | "userno232000" userno232000 |
Date: | Wed May 30, 2007 8:35 am ((PDT)) |
> -Dan Dugan > > p.s. I use 64dBA for my reference field because 1) it's 30dB below > the standard 94dB used to rate the sensitivity of mics, 2) It isn't > so loud it drives you crazy, and 3) a recorder set to around -5dbFS > recording level with a 64dBA field seems to be ideal for most > soundscapes. > > -dD- > Thanks Dan, I've been looking for that number. By FS do you mean hard clipping? You're the same Dan Dugan that I came across years ago when my daughter was in a Waldorf school? (she asked to be removed with no objections from us). Small world, BTW I won't mention it here again. -Scott |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Man made noise and nature recording, John Hartog |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Measuring noise levels, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Measuring noise levels, Dan Dugan |
Next by Thread: | Re: Measuring noise levels, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU