Hi Danny,
I was not trying to enter the debate - just trying to clarify. You
suggested that switching to 24bit would have solved your clipping
problem, but if your gain levels are already set way low in 16bit and
it is clipping then, it will probably still be clipping if you switch
to 24bit unless you attenuate somehow - right? Isn't X dB still X dB
and 0 still 0 in either format? Just wondering?
-John Hartog
--- In "Danny Meltzer"
<> wrote:
>
> Alright yeah...
>
> What exactly are we all debating at this point? I don't think anyone
> can make a case that 24bit is superfluous and unnecessary. Whether or
> not it is a useful upgrade in your own recording setup has to be a
> personal choice. For me it's clear as day that it gives me better
> recordings and helps to capture the nuances of very dynamic sounds.
>
> Here's an organized discussion of this:
>
> http://www.tweakheadz.com/16_vs_24_bit_audio.htm
>
> Danny
>
> --- In "John Hartog"
> <hartogj_1999@> wrote:
> >
> > Considering you kept the pots in the same position. Would switching to
> > 24 bit actually have given you more headroom, or would it have only
> > lowered the noise floor?
> >
> > -John Hartog
> >
> > > Here's one example where I was recording 16/48 and 24 would have
> > been better. I was recording a male lion roaring from 15 feet away.
> The
> > > very beginning of the roar was so loud it clipped even though I
> had my
> > > pots way down in anticipation. 24 bit would have given me more
> > > headroom and would have soaked up the level much better.
> > >
> > > Danny
> > >
> >
>
|