Subject: | Re: A Manifesto About Quality: Five Theses |
---|---|
From: | "John Hartog" hartogj |
Date: | Thu May 24, 2007 10:43 am ((PDT)) |
Hi GP, I like your "five theses". However I don't see any reason the content of discussions on this group should be prioritized in any such an order. The importance of a topic has nothing to do with the amount of discussion required to reach an understanding. And too much can become too much with any topic. I am all for variety, and the best way to get more variety is for group members to jump in when things get old and change the subject by starting new threads. Thanks for starting a new thread. -John Hartog --- In "geopaul7" <> wrote: > > This is being offered as a good natured suggestion to prioritize the importance of topics, > without taking away the extremely fun "gear talk," that comes from our archetypal > appreciation for tools. > > GP > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Recording Device., Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: A Manifesto About Quality: Five Theses, Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | A Manifesto About Quality: Five Theses, geopaul7 |
Next by Thread: | Re: A Manifesto About Quality: Five Theses, Rob Danielson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU