Subject: | Re: Investing in high-end mics (was Fostex FR-2LE preamplifier noise |
---|---|
From: | "Tim Nielsen" supernielsen |
Date: | Tue May 8, 2007 9:34 am ((PDT)) |
If you're thinking of moving from MS to XY, I'd offer the opinion that you're trading apples for apples. MS, properly decoded, IS xy. When I've done tests of large scale sound systems, my MS and a friends XY Schoeps setups, were nearly identical. We actually both agreed that if anything, the imaging on the MS was a tiny bit better, but almost imperceptible. Now, different techniques such as spaced omni's, Blumlein, ORTF, will definitely sound different, and it would be worth trying some of them. The problem is, I would think that unless you're comparing the same band of mics, it would be a difficult test, the mics themselves will color your testing as much as the stereo method. But I'm still convinced that a quality MS rig, like the MKH or Schoeps, will yield more than satisfactory results, even in a wide soundscape. Tim |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Metadata help, Martyn Stewart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Metadata help, Lou Judson |
Previous by Thread: | Metadata help, Martyn Stewart |
Next by Thread: | Re: Investing in high-end mics (was Fostex FR-2LE preamplifier noise, Scott Fraser |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU