Subject: | 1. Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods (was Rich being Testy |
---|---|
From: | "Curt Olson" flipov411 |
Date: | Mon May 7, 2007 7:03 am ((PDT)) |
Phil Tyler wrote: > I would be interested to hear one of your tests comparing a Hi-MD with > the new Fostex, in fact if truth be known many people are waiting for > that one I reckon! I'll have a Fostex FR-2LE and Sony MZ-M100 with me on a nature recording trip most of this week. Will plan to make a comparison test for those who might be interested. (For those who might not be interested, please just try to ignore it and not be offended.) Curt Olson PS: If anyone wants to suggest some protocols to make it as useful a comparison as possible, please shoot me an e-mail off list by noon today, Central time. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Spring in Germany, Part II, davidbarnas@aim.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | documenting recordings..., Rob Danielson |
Previous by Thread: | 1. Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods (was Rich being Testy, Phil Tyler |
Next by Thread: | [gear] Edirol R4 Pro features, oryoki2000 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU