naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

1. Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods (was Rich being Testy

Subject: 1. Re: Equipment Testing Goals Methods (was Rich being Testy
From: "Curt Olson" flipov411
Date: Mon May 7, 2007 7:03 am ((PDT))
Phil Tyler wrote:

> I would be interested to hear one of your tests comparing a Hi-MD with
> the new Fostex, in fact if truth be known many people are waiting for
> that one I reckon!

I'll have a Fostex FR-2LE and Sony MZ-M100 with me on a nature
recording trip most of this week. Will plan to make a comparison test
for those who might be interested. (For those who might not be
interested, please just try to ignore it and not be offended.)

Curt Olson

PS: If anyone wants to suggest some protocols to make it as useful a
comparison as possible, please shoot me an e-mail off list by noon
today, Central time.





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU