Subject: | Re: [gear] when size matters: recorder dimensions |
---|---|
From: | "Mark R." seoulgypsy |
Date: | Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:26 pm ((PDT)) |
Conspicuously interesting that a tried and true maker like Nagra have a small size with a robust density, while a company like Zoom is quite the opposite. Best, Mark Nagra ARES-M 125 x 52 x 20 mm 130 cc 246 g = recorder w/ 1GB internal flash memory (200 g) + 2 AA cells (46 g) Zoom H4 35 x 70 x 153 mm 375 cc 251 g = recorder (190 g) + 2 AA cells (46 g) + CF card (15g) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Shoulder-Carried, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Shure WL183 now MX183?, Philip Tyler |
Previous by Thread: | [gear] when size matters: recorder dimensions, oryoki2000 |
Next by Thread: | Handheld, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU