Subject: | 3. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!! |
---|---|
From: | "Raimund Specht" animalsounds |
Date: | Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:17 pm ((PDT)) |
> Raimund Specht wrote: > > >Yes, that impedance matching will make sure that the disturbances > >entering in the cable will be compensated. However, in this way, the > >noise originating from the phantom power will only be present on pin > >2. Dan Dugan wrote: > If you're talking about noise from the phantom power source in the > recorder, it will be applied equally (depending on the accuracy of > the series resistors) to pins 2 and 3, assuming equal impedance > (which is why the dummy network on pin 3 of the mic) and will be > canceled by the balance of the mic preamp. Yes, of course. I just tried to explain to Klas that his unbalanced microphone output (where pin 3 is not connected to the usual series resistor) is not able to tolerate any potential phantom power noise. The debate started here: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/message/27021 Raimund |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | 2. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Chuck B |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 4. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Klas Strandberg |
Previous by Thread: | 3. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Klas Strandberg |
Next by Thread: | 3. Re: Phantom power noise - again!!!, Klas Strandberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU