Subject: | Re: Newbie question: XLR for camcorder vs. digital recorder |
---|---|
From: | "Marc Myers" buffymarmoset |
Date: | Tue Feb 6, 2007 3:26 pm ((PST)) |
Jeff The best audio recordings will result from using a separate recorder. But if you need the audio and video recording to be synchronized it can be fairly challenging to get them timed together particularly if you record a lot of material. Whatever microphone you choose, it's best to get it some distance from the camera. They sell boom arms that attach to the camera for this purpose if you are working alone. The line level inputs are almost always less noisy than the mic level inputs on video cameras so yes, you should use a preamp. Microphones really depend on your circumstances. For interview I prefer a short shotgun and use it for most other work as well. The Sanken microphones are awesome but the ME66 is a good choice and gives you the option of using other capsules as well. Marc |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Newbie question: XLR for camcorder vs. digital recorder, Rob Danielson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Newbie question: XLR for camcorder vs. digital recorder, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Newbie question: XLR for camcorder vs. digital recorder, Rob Danielson |
Next by Thread: | Re: Newbie question: XLR for camcorder vs. digital recorder, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU