--- In Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>
> At 4:34 AM +0000 1/26/07, Rich Peet wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >My only recommendation would be to fill in the two missing sides with
> >another pair of mics. I call that a Cube mic with triplets.
>
> Yes, but Tom's mic capsule diaphragms are mounted perpendicular to
> the boundaries. Perpendicular mounting seems to produce more front
> (center) "staging" in the stereo field compared to the flush mounting
> on perpendicular boundaries. In a surround rig, the arrangement might
> produce little more separation between front and back with warmer,
> slightly less articulate sides.
>
> > Then you will have a choice of stereo pairs with different sound
> >field depths
> >as well as an ability to record 4 channel immersion surround using
> >your two md's.
>
> With perpendicular capsule mounting, the LF / LR & RF / RR channels
> can still be paired as opposing omni's. It might be safer (in respect
> to timing/phasing) to pair-up the recorders/channels as front/back
> when recording on two, wild recorders. Rob D.
>
> >
> >Nice long wires in the photo too.
> >
> >Rich Peet KD0AG
> >
Hi Rich, Rob, Phil, Roger, Richard and the Group
Many thanks for your comments.
I do hace a second set of triplets, based on the 35-0192s that are
currently in my home made parabolic reflector
http://ad2004.hku.nl/naturesound/TomR/PC230088.JPG
http://ad2004.hku.nl/naturesound/TomR/P1270095.JPG
So it would be quite easy to make up a cube mic, and using two
identical MZ-NH1s to make four track recordings.
My problem would be what on earth to do with them when I've recorded
them? I've only just managed to master the rudiments of Audacity and
do not have any other sound type programs (other than SonicSstage of
course).
I am windows XP Pro based - any reccommendations?
I am quite happy to make the recordings and supply the resulting discs
for processing.
|
