[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Story

Subject: Re: Story
From: "John Hartog" hartogj
Date: Sat Sep 30, 2006 11:09 pm (PDT)
As habitats and species (and to keep this on topic =96 natural
soundscapes) become rarer they will continue to become more valuable
in the public eye, and more and more people will place a higher value
on habitat protection.  More land use restrictions are probably
inevitable, but even so, good soil and habitats (and quiet places)
will continue to be destroyed by development.

It is always a tragedy when good people's (especially nature sound
recordists) livelihoods become compromised.  I would agree they should
be compensated for their losses, however unlikely.

John Hartog

--- In  Walter Knapp <> wrote:
> Posted by: "John Hartog"
> > Walt, you know I (being a streetwise city kid) can't help but comment.
> >
> > Such perceptions are common and our activities as nature recordists
> > will be taken as intrusions by some no matter how decent, benign (or
> > corrupt)our true motives.
> > Where habitats are faced with destruction there is often a human
> > between greed and compassion, and in this I see no great differences
> > separating city from country folk.
> The big and very significant difference is that much of that habitat is
> owned by country folk, often in the family for generations. I don't see
> city folk too often having their property invaded and being restricted
> in the use of their property by environmentalists. Quite simply it's
> taking without compensation. Often by people who then proceed to
> the habitat in the name of conservation.
> I am only providing a reflection on what I deal with all the time in
> survey work. Often I have to hide the fact I'm acting as a volunteer
> the GA DNR, a government agency. These folks did not go negative for no
> reason, it's become a matter of personal survival for them.  Like
> recently after a court decision that allowed it they wiped out nearly
> half the remaining wetlands just because to allow them to continue
> have wiped them out. It's come down to survival.
> And that does not even start in on the government defining the "highest
> and best use" of any land as dense urban blight (though they don't call
> it that). Rabbit hutches for people sprawling across the countryside.
> That includes, in some cases the richest and best agriculture soil in
> the country.
> No, city folk have a lot to answer for. Not that I'm saying country
> are lilly white, but the contrast is large. I think country folk have a
> very legitimate beef.
> Walt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU