| Subject: | Re: Telinga EM23 vs RodeNT1A vs AKG SE300+CK98 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Klas Strandberg" klasstrandberg |
| Date: | Sat Sep 2, 2006 3:50 am (PDT) |
>...snip... > >The EM23s appear to be 4.5dB more sensitive than the Rodes. >The AKG appear to be 2.5dB more sensitive than the Rodes. >Then I analyzed the recording in the spectrum window of Adobe >Audition 2.0 with a large FFT size (65536) and by averaging across >few seconds of recording. > >After compensating for the different sensitivities, at 12kHz I get a >noise level of -112 with the Rodes, -101dB with the EM23 and -97dB >with the AKG. But a significative difference is that the noise floor >is flat for the AKG and Rodes, while in the EM23 is not flat: -96dB >at 6 kHz and -110 at 40 kHz. I'm not sure that I understand.... Klas. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Site update including new Maryland Nature Recordists section!, Danny Meltzer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Telinga EM23 vs RodeNT1A vs AKG SE300+CK98, Gianni Pavan |
| Previous by Thread: | Telinga EM23 vs RodeNT1A vs AKG SE300+CK98, Gianni Pavan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Telinga EM23 vs RodeNT1A vs AKG SE300+CK98, Gianni Pavan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU