Subject: | Re: to Dan Dugan, KM 183 vs. 3032 (was Group Omni Mic Rigs) |
---|---|
From: | "Dan Dugan" dandugan_1999 |
Date: | Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:26 pm (PDT) |
>dan dugan, i hope its allright to you if i ask you one or two >questions about your comparison. hope you are around... >you compared the neumann mks with the at 3032. but with different pre >amps. >did you tried them with same pre amps afterwards? Shure WL183 mics--they're omni lavaliers, well-suited for body wear in the field. But around 22-23 dBA self-noise. >(and how can it be that the at=B4s are so much less noisy?) Maybe not so amazing compared to a Neumann...but the 3032s are amazing for the price. >do you use the AT3032 seriously? I intend to use them with a Jecklin Disc for set-up recordings. Haven't assembled that system yet. I'm currently using Telinga EM-23s, shoulder-mounted. -Dan Dugan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: to Dan Dugan, KM 183 vs. 3032 (was Group Omni Mic Rigs), evs |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: 3032 vs. EM-23 (was to Dan Dugan KM 183 vs. 3032), John Hartog |
Previous by Thread: | Re: to Dan Dugan, KM 183 vs. 3032 (was Group Omni Mic Rigs), evs |
Next by Thread: | Re: 3032 vs. EM-23 (was to Dan Dugan KM 183 vs. 3032), John Hartog |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU