thanks for the links, rob!
dan dugan, i hope its allright to you if i ask you one or two
questions about your comparison. hope you are around...
you compared the neumann mks with the at 3032. but with different pre
amps.
did you tried them with same pre amps afterwards?
(and how can it be that the at=B4s are so much less noisy?)
do you use the AT3032 seriously?
all the best
evs
>
> Hi EVS
> Sorry. The link was in my eariler post:
> http://www.trackseventeen.com
>
> such as:
> http://www.trackseventeen.com/soundscapes/x060405i-
> crex_frogs_short.mp3
>
> II don't see links to Curts omni rigs but I'm sure he'd post some if
> you contacted him. Curt Olson:
>
>
> Walt's SASS modified w/MKH-20's:
> http://frogrecordist.home.mindspring.com/docs/mod_sass.html
>
> Dan Dugan:
> http://www.dandugan.com/downloads/
> (you can posts on the list relevant to many of the files here)
>
> Rob D.
>
> =3D =3D =3D =3D
>
> At 6:12 PM -0500 8/21/06, Rob Danielson wrote:
> >At 7:52 PM +0200 8/21/06, evs wrote:
> >> >
> > >anybody used MBHO microphones?
> >
> >I've used the MBHO MBP-603A's w/KA100 diffuse omni capsules for
> >several years. They are noisier and have more pronounced bass than
> >mkh-20's. The AT-3032's are similar to my MBHO's. The high end noise
> >of the 30302's seems a bit grainier and there's a little less clarity
> >under 300Hz with the 3032's. The MBHO's with the MBP-603A's preamp
> >modules are a very easy to mount-- even for micing while walking.
> >
> >For omni's in moisture the mkh-20's or mkh-800 are widely accepted
> >top performers. For omni's in low or no moisture, MK2's would get my
> >nod over mkh-20's for ambience. Ultimate: 2 mkh-800's
> >(multi-pattern). For omni's on a budget: AT3032's
> >http://www.trackseventeen.com
> >Rob D.
>
>
>
>
|