Oops, I was wrong. There is worldwide coverage of varying quality. Topo
maps for US only.
Remember to right-click and drag to change aspect.
Bruce Wilson
http://wilson.dynu.net
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Bruce Wilson
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:42 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] google earth/WorldWind
I like Google Earth, but tend to use NASA World Wind for visualization.
You can choose between color imagery, enhanced IR, B&W high-res, and
topo maps. USA only.
http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/
Bruce Wilson
http://wilson.dynu.net
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Ray Mansell
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:35 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] google earth
Google Earth is good. You should also check local.live.com, which I find
often has higher resolution images.
Ray mansell
Rich Peet wrote:
> FYI
> This is a fairly well known free program but I have not seen a post
> about it here yet. But then, I have been a bit out of touch with
> people and groups this year.
>
>
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links
|