Thank you, Rob! What a presentation! It looks like we're taking pretty
much the same approach to post EQ, but yours seems to be more
sophisticated. I hope to pick your brain about this and several other
other things at the campout.
Incidentally, I see you're using Firium. I spent most of last Friday
getting acquainted with it. The "learn" feature is going to come in
very handy, but I'm not impressed with the matching EQ curves it
generates. I did better by using the frequency content graphs to
generate my own match curves. It's also very demanding of processing
power -- especially on my aging G3 iBook. I have to use it sparingly.
Curt Olson
Rob Danielson wrote:
> Hi Curt- Sure! I would very much enjoy learning about the post
> techniques you and others use too. One good way to do this is at the
> camp out in June, but I did make a QuickTime movie that introduces
> some of the assumptions I've been making:
>
>
> https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/public/temporary/MicPreClarity125
> -700HzTest.mov
>
> There's a good chance there's not be enough general interest for us to =
> elaborate sufficiently on list. If there are a few folks who are
> interested, we could open a blog on the topic. Rob D.
>
> =3D =3D =3D =3D =3D
>
>
> At 9:28 AM -0500 4/29/06, Curt Olson wrote:
>> Rob Danielson wrote:
>>
>>> ...recording deep space in a remote location places great demands on
>>> mics-- more than any other event I've tried to record and careful EQ
>>> can restore quite a bit of balance.
>>
>> You mentioned this a few weeks ago in commenting on a test recording I
>> posted. Would you mind elaborating a bit more on your observations
>> about post EQ?
>>
>> Curt Olson
|