Wild Sanctuary <> wrote:
> Having recorded with every known pattern and system, MS provides, by
> far, the most versitile and robust result for our purposes
> (soundscape study and evaluation, number of applications from one
> recording, media production and archiving). No other system comes
> close in my opinion.
Then Julius wrote
<This all depends on what microphones you use, where you place them,
and what you want to record. To say that you have recorded with
every known pattern and system does not sound feasable.
And again, I would prefer the Blumlein pattern/image in this example.>
--
Bernie has been recording nature sounds possibly well before you were a
glint in your fathers eye :) so to me this does sound feasible, why not?
All this talk of mc patterns is surely down to personal taste and how you
determine what is best for you? The industry standard is MS 30/40 I happen
to like this too, it's a toss-up between MS and SASS 20/20.
In my humble opinion...
Martyn
****************************************
Martyn Stewart
Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
http://www.naturesound.org
Redmond. Washington. USA
N47.65543 W121.98428
e-mail:
Tel: 425-898-0462
Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
*****************************************
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|