| Subject: | Re: review tascam HD-P2 |
|---|---|
| From: | vicki powys <> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:13:37 +1100 |
All, With recent discussion about the new CF recorders that can record at 48 kHz/16 bit, 96 kHz/24 bit etc., can someone please clarify the following: If the recording is going to be downsized to CD quality 44 kHz/16 bit, is there an advantage in field recording at the higher kHz and bit rates? Can you hear any difference on a CD, of recordings made originally at different kHz/bit rates? Vicki Powys Australia ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Having nothing to do with nature sounds... but, J. Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Bottoming-out revisited, John Hartog |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: review tascam HD-P2, Marc Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: review tascam HD-P2, derek holzer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU