Hi all!
It made me pissed (excuse me) not to come to a - to me - logical and
sensible result testing the MT mic input.
So: I have today focused on the 3,5 mm input, refusing to talk to people
and not answering the phone.
Not doing the dishes or walking the dog. I am now finally pleased with the=
reliability of my test.
At http://www.telinga.com/gallery/gallery_private.htm I have posted a file=
from a test, done repeatedly, again and again with the same result:
It is a comparison between the MT 24/96 (3,5 mm input) and the well known
and accepted Tascam DAP1. Lots of people have made excellent recordings
with the Tascam!
As a microphone I used one channel of a Stereo DATmic + the PRO6 handle,
which runs both on phantom power -Tascam - and a external power box for the=
MT 24/96
It's a ticking clock + ambience + the noise from the Tascam motor. (I had
it running also when the MT24/96 was tested)
The file is 3 sec of xx and then 3 sec of yy and another 3 sec of xx and
so on.
Who can hear which is which? There is a difference, but.... folks...
Klas
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|