I ran a crude test here using common mic and noise source. I couldn't see
any difference.
Gene
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Rob Danielson
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 11:12 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] NH900 vs. RH10 gain False Alarm
As he prepared to do the test, Alan discovered that the RH-10's mic
sensitivity was set to "Low." The record gain is very close for the
two units. I recently had several normal NH900 settings change at
once which I suspect was from leaving the unit without a battery for
several days. Rob D.
At 9:59 AM -0500 9/22/05, Rob Danielson wrote:
>Allan Haighton will be doing a test over the next week too. I don't
>have a RH-10. Rob D.
>
>At 7:47 AM -0700 9/22/05, Eugene E Dorcas wrote:
>>I will give it a try soon. It might be a few days before I get a little
time.
>>
>>John Hartog <> wrote:Hi Eugene,
>>Since you own both recorders, any chance you could do a more formal
>>comparison between the two? I think some of us would benefit from any
>>further investigation into this matter. I had been considering a
>>RH10, mostly based on descriptions of its nicely lit display, but if
>>it means compromising gain, it's probably not worth it.
>>- John Hartog
>>
>>
>>> Eugene E Dorcas wrote:
>>> I haven't done any purposeful comparisons but sometimes I feel that
>>my nh900 outperforms the newer rh10. I like the rh10 because of the
>>easily viewable display at night while recording frogs. However, I use
>>the mh900 before the rh10 when practical.
>>>
>>> Rob Danielson wrote:
>>> At 8:16 AM -0700 9/21/05, Eugene E Dorcas wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> >I use a NH900 and a RH10 for my recorders.
>>>
>>> Have you, by chance, detected a difference in the amount of record
>>> gain between these units? Another recordist reported to me that his
>>> RH-10 seems to have less gain. Preliminary. Rob D.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Microphones are not ears,
>>> Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>> A listening room is not nature."
>>> Klas Strandberg
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Microphones are not ears,
>>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>A listening room is not nature."
>>Klas Strandberg
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Microphones are not ears,
>>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>>A listening room is not nature."
>>Klas Strandberg
>>Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Rob Danielson
>Film Department
>University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Rob Danielson
Film Department
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
Yahoo! Groups Links
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|