naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NH900 vs. RH10 gain False Alarm

Subject: Re: NH900 vs. RH10 gain False Alarm
From: "Mark R." <>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:11:11 +0900
On 9/24/05, Rob Danielson <> wrote:
>
> As he prepared to do the test, Alan discovered that the RH-10's mic
> sensitivity was set to "Low." The record gain is very close for the
> two units.

  This is my only gripe with RH 10 unit that I own. The sound is superb,
although it is a pain in the ass to reset and change settings every time.
Once I remember to check everything, all is golden. Then the remote has many
advantages in the field, as I stuff my unit away in jacket pockets and hang
the remote to record at will.
 Mark R.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________


"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU