| Subject: | Re: NH900 vs. RH10 mic pre gain (was noise) |
|---|---|
| From: | Rob Danielson <> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:57:41 -0500 |
At 8:16 AM -0700 9/21/05, Eugene E Dorcas wrote: <snip> >I use a NH900 and a RH10 for my recorders. Have you, by chance, detected a difference in the amount of record gain between these units? Another recordist reported to me that his RH-10 seems to have less gain. Preliminary. Rob D. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: noise, Klas Strandberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: EM-23 (was noise), Rob Danielson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2GB limit, changing cards, flawn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NH900 vs. RH10 mic pre gain (was noise), Eugene E Dorcas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU