naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: draft procedure for amateur recording in parks, v. 2

Subject: RE: draft procedure for amateur recording in parks, v. 2
From: "Gene Dorcas" <>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:22:35 -0500
Sorry. I wasn't clear in my interest in a pre.  I was referring to my
problem with my DIY parabolic in its ability due to its acoustic gain to
overdrive my MD recorder. I was looking for some variable attenuation.
Maybe I should just look at building up an L-pad or something.

I also have a PMD660 which provides some attenuation with the "mic gain" but
I have noticed an increase in noise over that which I get with the MD.

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Rob Danielson
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 10:21 AM
To: 
Subject: RE: [Nature Recordists] draft procedure for amateur recording in
parks, v. 2

At 10:05 AM -0500 8/31/05, Gene Dorcas wrote:
>Thank you so much for your efforts. We've needed this. While I'm still a
>newbie I can appreciate a benchmark that I can use when purchasing and
using
>my recording equipment.
>
>I am currently using a NH900 and RH10 as recorders and 2 sets of 183's.  I
>wish for the financial ability to purchase MKH quality but it's nice to
know
>that my rig falls within the specs as you've listed here.
>
>I have 2 sets of 183's.  One pair is used as binaural for ambience
recording
>and the other pair is in a DIY parabolic.  My current need is a pre or
other
>way to attenuate the signals from my parabolic pair. It frequently over
>drives my recorder(s). I have to set the mic sensitivity to "LOW".

Thats a very good way to attenuate your mic signals (with these 
HiMD's) unless you can see the caps are topping out in the dish.

>  I
>recognize the MP2 as sort of a standard pre but my question is - does the
>current model, Sound Design "MixPre" sufficiently replace the Mp2.
>Thank,
>Gene

Not sure I understand where the ext pre would be used. There's little 
or nothing to gain running  183's through a external pre prior to the 
HiMD's.

The Mixpre and MP2 are very, very similar. The later has the ability 
to monitor M-S micing in the headphones (with or without encoding). 
The Mixpre can be used to mix the L&R signals or even send both only 
to one channel. The Mixpre has a non standard eternal power 
connector. I like the mp2 better, but you'd be happy with a MixPre, 
unless you plan to do a lot of MS micing someday. Same unit, audio 
performance and sound-wise.  They do show up used. Rob D.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: 
> On Behalf Of Dan Dugan
>Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 1:56 PM
>To: Nature Recordists
>Subject: [Nature Recordists] draft procedure for amateur recording in
parks,
>v. 2
>
>Dear friends, this is what we're doing in Muir Woods. Your comments
>will be appreciated.
>
>-Dan Dugan
>
>Recording Protocol for Soundscape Monitoring
>Version 2.0 (Draft)
>
>This is an attempt to set standards for audio recording in
>conjunction with attended soundscape monitoring, so that the work of
>different recordists will be comparable.
>
>Format
>       Stereo digital audio.
>
>Microphones
>       Type: condensor.
>       Frequency response: at least 40Hz to 16KHz
>       Equivalent noise: lower than 25 dBA (signal to noise 69 dB or
>better).
>       Effective windscreens are essential. Manufacturer-provided
>foam windscreens are inadequate for outdoor work. Good windscreens
>can be home-made.
>       Shockmounts are highly desirable, especially if hand-held.
>
>Stereo Microphone Arrays (listed in the order of preference, best first)
>       A: Spaced omnidirectional mics with barrier: Jecklin disc,
>shoulder mounts, head-worn quasi-binaural, lavs tied around a tree.
>       B: ORTF array (cardioids spaced 17cm, splayed at 110 degrees).
>       C:  One-point stereo mic X-Y or M-S.
>       Highly directional types like shotgun or parabolic dish are
>not applicable for soundscape recording.
>
>Recorders
>       Any digital audio recorder with adequately quiet mic preamps.
>MiniDisc, Compact Flash or hard drive are all good. A record level
>control with steps is a plus. Some kind of scale on the record gain
>control (at least 0-10) is necessary for repeatability.
>
>Recording Level
>       To establish a starting point, hold the microphone at arms
>length, sensitive side facing you. Speak normally to a person near
>you. Set the recording gain so that the peaks don't exceed a level of
>-5dB on the recorder's meter. This gain will work for quiet
>environments. Loud sounds will require lower gains.
>
>Calibration
>       An affordable scheme for calibrating field recording outfits
>is being sought. Here is one proposal:
>       Terminology: "Recording Gain" is the setting of the recorder.
>"Recording Level" is the reading of the recorder's peak meter.
>       Equipment: A digital audio workstation with speakers, a sound
>level meter, the recording outfit to be calibrated.
>       Procedure:
>1) Prepare a stereo track of pink noise. Make the channels
>uncorrelated if possible.
>2) Filter the track with a high-pass at 200Hz and a low-pass at 2000Hz.
>3) Play the track and read the sound level meter while adjusting the
>monitor level to 65dBA (slow) at a normal listening position
>(measuring position).
>4) Place your mic precisely at the measuring position and adjust the
>recording gain so that the recorder's peak meter reads -5dB (this is
>dBFS, meaning "decibels full-scale").
>5) Note your recorder's gain setting. Use this as a standard gain for
>recording in quiet places.
>6) Make a one-minute recording of this calibration noise. Save it to
>calibrate transfers later.
>
>Slates
>       Each take should have a voice announcement (slate) at the
>head or tail including:
>               Recordist's name
>               Date
>               Time
>               Location
>               Weather and wind conditions
>               Microphone(s) model number
>               Recorder model number
>               Recorder gain setting
>                          Optional description of the scene and the
>sound sources you can identify, observed wildlife behavior.
>
>Monitoring
>       Recording should always be monitored on headphones except
>when doing simultaneous attended logging. Attended logging must be
>done with naked ears.
>
>Delivery
>       Make a CD with a track for each monitoring location. Five
>fifteen-minute locations with one-minute slates will just fit on an
>80-minute CDR. Write your name, the date and the time-slot on the
>disc with a list of tracks.
>       Tape a Tyvek CD sleeve inside a standard file folder. Write
>the slate and track information on the outside of the folder. Put a
>code number on the folder tab: YYMMDD-T (year-month-day, time slot;
>example 050720-night)
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Danielson
Film Department
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee



"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 






________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU