Martyn et al--
Finally, here are the NT1A's performing, X-Y angled at 60 degrees
through a wet, drippy night along the Kickapoo River in SE Wisconsin,
May 26, 2005.
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Temporary/7723EQSparseRvrNiteSeq.mp3
44mb (mp3)
Its a 30 minute sequence of cross-faded segments starting with the
10pm town siren in LaFarge through sunrise recorded on the Sound
Devices 722, full gain. If you want to download it rather than have
it load in your browser, go to the directory at
http://www.uwm.edu/~type/Temporary
and right click on the link: 7723EQSparseRvrNiteSeq.mp3 and select
the "save to disk" option. Mac folks, use control-click. Rob D.
= = = = =
At 3:32 PM -0700 6/22/05, Martyn Stewart wrote:
>Let us just hope that someone gets out in the field to use these rather than
>quoting mic specs, I personally would like to hear results.
>
>Martyn
>
>Martyn Stewart
>Bird and Animal Sounds Digitally Recorded at:
>http://www.naturesound.org
>
>N47.65543 W121.98428
>Redmond. Washington. USA
>Make every Garden a wildlife Habitat!
>
>425-898-0462
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
> On Behalf Of Rob Danielson
>Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:18 AM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] 722 vs [was] NT1-A and moisture
>
>At 1:22 PM -0400 6/22/05, Walter Knapp wrote:
>>From: Rob Danielson <>
>
><snip>
>
>>When Rode makes a figure-8, compare that to a MKH-30.
>>
>>One other small reason I went with the MKH series is that it's one of
>>the few series that includes a figure-8. In my M/S I'm using same brand
>>and series for both mics. Makes me at least feel like I have a somewhat
>>matched set of mics in my M/S.
>>
>>Walt
>>
>>
>
>The new, NT2-A is variable polar pattern (cardioid, fig 8 and omni)
>and seems to be based on the same electronics as the NT1-A.
>Hopefully, they'll be _fairly_ well-matched for M-S. The $600 combo
>could provide great stereo imagery or it could be very poor-- no way
>to tell this without field testing. The 30 and 40 work well together
>above 200Hz but the 40's stronger bass response makes the center
>heavy unless addressed with EQ. No big deal. With some EQ, I seem to
>be able to cover about 230 degrees with tonal eveness with my mkh
>30/40 pair which is impressive. That large capsules tend to be more
>treble centric than small capsules, as Dan points out, could detract
>from the tonal uniformity of the Rode MS stereo field. The 2A alone
>weighs as much as 4- 30/40 combos,.. Rob D.
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|