Re: me-62 v w183
"Rich Peet" <>
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:00:11 -0000
--- In Rob Danielson <> wrote:
> Thanks a ton Rich! Actually, the blend is sound elements with high
> water trickles and low rumbles is quite useful. What was your record
> gain on the MD recorder? Was it the same for both recordings?
> I took two, 2 second segments from each test that seemed the most
> similar in level and made a quicktime movie with a spectral display
> for each. I briefly dissolved the two graphs at the transition point.
> You can see what you describe: the greater warmth/lower mid range and
> upper bass "roar" of the ME-62 and the lifted high end of the 183's.
> Also the frequency and output differences between the 183 caps are
> Movie, full 16 bit uncompressed (4mb) (the hi end differences better
> are more audible)
> Movie, compressed sound (277K)
> Rob D.
Gain was manual and set about mid level. I switched the plugs as fast
as I could between mics. Neither the loudest highs or lows were on
axis for either mic.
But take care in evaluating this test because I have heard;
"Rich sometimes has trouble distinguishing between his imagination or
agenda and reality. One has to filter what he says as a result."
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: